Menu

[Get Answer ]-Writing Need Help Please 95

Question Description

Required Text

Williams, C. R., &Arriago, B. A. (2012). Ethics, crime, and criminal justice (2nd ed.).Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Final Paper
In an eight- to ten-page paper,address the following:

  • Describe and explain two theories/modelsof ethics/morality as outlined in the text. One of them should be close toa model that you believe in or one you can relate to.
  • Compare the theories/models of ethics/morality. What isdifferent about them? What is the same? 
  • How do they explain morality or ethics?
  • Explain, by comparing and contrasting, how each wouldview the following:
    • criminal behavior
    • police corruption
    • criminal responsibility, punishment, or consequences
  • Identify a model that explains your moral thinking orwhat you believe is a good theory for morality? Explain why you chose thismodel. Use an example from your life or personal beliefs to explain yourreasoning.

You may use examples from the text,your experiences, or criminal justice to explain any of the concepts above andillustrate your points. Use at least five academic resources other than therequired text to support your claims. Two of theses resources must come fromthe Ashford Online Library.

Choose from the following theories/models:

  • Determinism
  • Indeterminism
  • Relativism
  • Objectivism
  • Universalism
  • Egoism
  • Divine Command Theory
  • Mutual Advantage
  • Kohlberg’s stages of Moral Development
  • Consequentialism
  • Deontology
  • Virtue Ethics
  • Utilitarianism

All sources must be properly cited,and the Final Paper must be formatted according the APA (6th edition) style. Ifyou would like to refer to APA samples and tutorials, review the APA Checklist within the Ashford Writing Center,located in the Learning Resources tab in the left navigation bar.

Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:

  • Must be a minimum of eight (8) double-spaced pages inlength (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted accordingto APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved style guide.
  • Must use a minimum of five (5) resources, two from theAshford Online Library.
  • Must provide a cover page that includes:
    • Paper Title
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must address the items found in Final Paper guidelines.
  • Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinctthesis statement.
  • Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and aconclusion paragraph.
  • Must use APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in theapproved APA style guide to document all sources.
  • Must include a Reference Page that is completedaccording to APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved APA styleguide.

Carefullyreview the Grading Rubric for thecriteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Description:

Total Possible Score: 20.00

Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement,and Conclusion

Total: 1.00

Distinguished- Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesisstatement, and conclusion.

Proficient- Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, andconclusion. One of these requires improvement.

Basic- Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion requireimprovement.

BelowExpectations – Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesisstatement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/orconclusion require much improvement.

Non-Performance- The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent orlack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Explains Two Theories/Models ofEthics/Morality as Outlined in the Text.

Total: 4.00

Distinguished- Thoroughly explains two theories/models of ethics/morality as outlined in thetext

Proficient – Explains two theories/models of ethics/morality asoutlined in the text. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic- Briefly explains two theories/models of ethics/morality as outlined in thetext. The explanation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts to explain two theories/models ofethics/morality as outlined in the text; however the explanation issignificantly underdeveloped, unclear, and/or is missing major components.

Non-Performance- The explanation of two theories/models of ethics/morality is eithernonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Compares and Contrasts the Two Theories/Modelsof Ethics/Morality as outlined in the text

Total: 4.00

Distinguished- Thoroughly compares and contrasts two theories/models of ethics/morality asoutlined in the text.

Proficient- Compares and contrasts two theories/models of ethics/morality as outlined inthe text. The comparison and contrast may need further development.

Basic- Briefly compares and contrasts two theories/models of ethics/morality asoutlined in the text. The comparison and contrast is underdeveloped.

BelowExpectations – Attempts to  compare and contrast two theories/models ofethics/morality as outlined in the text; however the comparison and contrast isunderdeveloped, unclear, and/or is missing major components.

Non-Performance- The comparison and contrast of two theories/models of ethics/morality iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignmentinstructions.

Compare Each Theory as it Relates to all threeIdentified Topics

Total: 3.00

Distinguished- Comprehensively compares each theory as it relates to all three identifiedtopics. The comparison of each theory is supported by relevant examples.

Proficient- Compares each theory as it relates to all three identified topics. Thecomparison of each theory is supported by relevant examples. The comparison ismissing minor details.

Basic- Briefly compares each theory as it relates to all three identified topics.The comparison of each theory is somewhat supported by examples. The comparisonis missing major details.

BelowExpectations – Attemps to compares each theory as it relates to all threeidentified topics; however, the comparison is not supported by examples,unclear and/or missing an identified topic.

Non-Performance- The comparison of each theory as it relates to the identified topics iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignmentinstructions.

Identifies a Theory that Respresents PersonalMorality and Explains why the Theory was Chosen

Total: 4.00

Distinguished – Identifies a theory that best representspersonal morality. Provides a thorough explanation of why the theory waschosen. The explanation is supported by examples from the text or personalexperiences.

Proficient – Identifies a theory that best represents personalmorality. Provides an explanation of why the theory was chosen. The explanationis supported by examples from the text or personal experiences, but may needfurther development.

Basic – Identifies a theory that best represents personalmorality. Provides a brief explanation of why the theory was chosen. Theexplanation is supported somewhat by examples from the text or personalexperiences but the explanation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Identifies a theory that best representspersonal morality and attempts to provide an explanation of why the theory waschosen; however, the explanation is not supported by examples from the text orpersonal experiences, is unclear, and/or is underdeveloped.

Non-Performance- The identification of a theory that represents personal morality andexplanation of why the theory was chosen are  either nonexistent or lackthe components described in the assignment instructions

Written Communication: Content Development

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and developsophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as awhole.

Proficient- Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the contextof the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Basic- Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it towarddiscovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping thewritten work.

BelowExpectations – Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to thetopic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work,and may distract the reader from its purpose.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Reading: Relationship to Text

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Analyzes texts for scholarly significance and pertinence within and acrossthe various disciplines, assessing them according to their contributions andconsequences.

Proficient- Utilizes texts in the context of scholarship to expand a foundation ofdisciplinary knowledge and to raise and discover significant inquiries.

Basic- Employs texts with the intent and expectation of increasing knowledge.

BelowExpectations – Approaches texts only within the context of assignment.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ampleanalysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinizedthoroughly.

Proficient- Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysisof the topic.

Basic- Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect theapplication of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

BelowExpectations – Displays information from external sources, but such informationmay lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of suchinformation toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered,delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient- Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enoughrelevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic- Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal informationfor a basic understanding.

BelowExpectations – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may notdeliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax andMechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics,such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easyto understand.

Proficient- Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spellingand grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easyto understand.

Basic- Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling andgrammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract thereader.

BelowExpectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics,such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, whichdistract the reader.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page,and reference page.

Proficient- Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a fewminor errors.

Basic- Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However,layout does not meet all APA requirements.

BelowExpectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There arefrequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignmentdescription.

Proficient- The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignmentdescription.

Basic- The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in theassignment description.

BelowExpectations – A fraction of the page requirement is completed.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished- Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compellingevidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and citedcorrectly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient- Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources onthe reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of theassignment.

Basic- Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sourcesmay not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within thebody of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

BelowExpectations – Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or nosupport for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on thereference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations arenot formatted correctly.

Non-Performance- The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in theinstructions.

you can change the amount

HTML tutorial

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.