Menu

[Get Answer ]-Wwriting Need Help Please

Question Description

Final Paper – AnAnalysis of Community Oriented Policing (COPPS) and Traditional PolicingTactics and Procedures paper is eight to ten pages

The purpose of the Final Paper is to analyze and explain the similarities anddifferences between traditional policing and COPPS as well as infer the futureof police leadership. Within the scope of the paper the student will berequired to address the following:

  • Compare and contrast Traditional Policing with COPPS.What is Traditional Policing? What is COPPS? What are the similarities andwhat are the differences between the two? What is the philosophy of each?
  • Explain the successful leadership traits that areinherent in each and how they overlap. What are leaders looking for fromtheir employees within each style?
  • Identify and describe the leadership and motivationaltheories applicable to each. Discuss how these theories are appliedpractically in police work today.
  • Compare how leadership, management, and supervision aredifferent and/or similar in Traditional Policing and COPPS.
  • Choose two modern crime issues andexplain how each style of policing would address these issues. Which styleis more effective for each issue, and why? Would a combination of stylesbe more effective? Why?
    Choices for crime issues:
    • Incidences of rape on a college campus
    • Multiple home robberies throughout a middle classneighborhood
    • Gang infighting
    • Drug use/abuse by affluent teenagers
    • Prostitution in a low-income residential neighborhood
    • Vandalism of inner-city schools
    • Possible terrorist activity/cell
    • High speed car races on city streets
    • Juvenile crime
    • Bullying in schools
    • Domestic disputes
    • Natural disasters
    • Major accidents
  • Which style of policing is most practical and effectivefor today’s world, or would a combination of both work? Explain why.
  • How will both styles need to change and/or beimplemented in the future to create successful supervision and leadershipof police? 

Writing the Final Paper
The Final Paper:

  • Must be a minimum of eight (8) double-spaced pages inlength (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted accordingto APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved style guide.
  • Must use a minimum of five (s) scholarly resources, twofrom the Ashford Library.
  • Must provide a cover page that includes:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must address one of the topics found in Final Paperguidelines.
  • Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinctthesis statement.
  • Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and aconclusion paragraph.
  • Must use APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in theapproved APA style guide to document all sources.
  • Must include a Reference Page that is completedaccording to APA (6th ed.) style as outlined in the approved APA styleguide.

Carefullyreview the Grading Rubric for thecriteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

Description:

Total Possible Score: 25.00

Comparesand Contrasts Traditional Policing with Community-Oriented Policing and ProblemSolving (COPPS) models

Total: 3.50

Distinguished – Provides acomprehensive compare and contrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPSmodels. Many relevant and specific examples from each policing model areprovided to support the comparison.

Proficient – Provides a compare andcontrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models. Examples from eachpolicing model are provided to support the comparison, but the compare contrastis slightly underdeveloped.

Basic – Provides a limited compareand contrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models. The comparison isunderdeveloped or examples provided minimally support the comparison.

Below Expectations – Attempts tocompare and contrast Traditional Policing and the COPPS models; however, thecomparison is unevenly balanced, significantly underdeveloped, and/or examplesprovided do not support the comparison.

Non-Performance – The comparison andcontrast of Traditional Policing and the COPPS models is either nonexistent orlacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

ExplainsLeadership Traits that are Inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Provides a detailedexplanation of leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing andCOPPS and how traits overlap. The explanation is supported by specific andrelevant examples.

Proficient – Provides an explanationof leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing and COPPS andhow traits overlap. The explanation is mostly supported by examples.

Basic – Provides a limitedexplanation of leadership traits that are inherent in Traditional Policing andCOPPS and how traits overlap. The explanation is somewhat supported byexamples.

Below Expectations – Attempts toprovides an explanation of leadership traits that are inherent in TraditionalPolicing and COPPS; however, the explanation is missing significant details,underdeveloped, and/or is not supported by examples.

Non-Performance – The explanation ofleadership traits in Traditional Policing and COPPS is either nonexistent orlacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Identifiesand Describes the leadership and motivational theories and Discusses HowTheories are Applied

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Identifies andcomprehensively describes two leadership and motivational theories applicableto each policing model. Provides a thorough discussion of how theories areapplied to police work today.

Proficient – Identifies anddescribes two leadership and motivational theories in either TraditionalPolicing or COPPS. Provides a discussion of how theories are applied to policework today. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Identifies and brieflydescribes two leadership and motivational theories in either TraditionalPolicing or COPPS. Provides a limited discussion of how theories are applied topolice work today. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Identifies andattempts to describe two leadership and motivational theories in eitherTraditional Policing or COPP and provide a  discussion of how theories areapplied; however, the discussion of the theories is unevenly balanced or significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The identificationof leadership and motivational theories applicable to Traditional Policing andCOPPS and discussion of how these theories are applied practically in policework today are either nonexistent or lack the components described in theassignment instructions.

ComparesLeadership, Management and Supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS

Total: 3.50

Distinguished – Provides a detailedcomparison of leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policingand COPPS. The comparison is supported by specific and relevant examples.

Proficient – Provides a comparisonof leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policing and COPPS.The comparison is supported by relevant examples, but is slightlyunderdeveloped.

Basic – Provides a minimalcomparison of leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policingand COPPS. The comparison is somewhat supported by examples and/or isunderdeveloped.

Below Expectations – Attempts tocompare the leadership, management, and supervision in Traditional Policing andCOPPS; however, the comparison is not supported by examples and/or issignificantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance – The comparison ofleadership, management, and supervision Traditional Policing and COPPS iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignmentinstructions.

IdentifiesTwo Modern Crime Issues and Explains How Each Style of Policing Would HandleThese Issues

Total: 3.00

Distinguished – Identifies two crimeissues and comprehensively explains how each policing model would address theissues. The explanation is supported by specific and relevant examples.

Proficient – Identifies two crimeissues and explains how each policing model would address the issues. Theexplanation is mostly supported by examples.

Basic – Identifies two crime issuesand minimally explains how each policing model would address the issues. Theexplanation is somewhat supported by examples.

Below Expectations – Identifies twocrime issues and attempts to explain how each policing model would address theissues; however, the explanation is not sufficiently supported by examples.

Non-Performance – The identificationof two modern crime issues and explanation of how each policing style wouldaddress the identified issues are either nonexistent or lack the componentsdescribed in the assignment instructions.

ExplainsWhich Policing Style is More Practical and Effective for Today’s World

Total: 3.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly explainswhich policing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is mostpractical and effective for today’s world. The explanation is supported byspecific and relevant details.

Proficient – Mostly explains whichpolicing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is mostpractical and effective for today’s world. The explanation is supported byrelevant details.

Basic – Minimally explains whichpolicing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is mostpractical and effective for today’s world. The explanation is somewhatsupported by details.

Below Expectations – Attempts to explainwhich policing style is more effective or if a combination of styles is mostpractical and effective for today’s world; however, the explanation is notsufficiently supported by details.

Non-Performance – The explanation ofwhich style of policing is more practical and effective for today’s world iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignmentinstructions.

DescribesHow Both Style s Need to Change and/or be Implemented in the Future to CreateSuccessful Supervision

Total: 1.50

Distinguished – Thoroughly describeshow both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future tocreate successful supervision.

Proficient – Describes how bothpolicing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to createsuccessful supervision. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Minimally describes how bothpolicing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future to createsuccessful supervision. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts todescribe how both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in thefuture to create successful supervision; however, significant details aremissing.

Non-Performance – The description ofhow both policing styles need to change and/or be implemented in the future iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignmentinstructions.

Reading:Relationship to Text

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Analyzes texts forscholarly significance and pertinence within and across the various disciplines,assessing them according to their contributions and consequences.

Proficient – Utilizes texts in thecontext of scholarship to expand a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and toraise and discover significant inquiries.

Basic – Employs texts with theintent and expectation of increasing knowledge.

Below Expectations – Approachestexts only within the context of assignment.

Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

WrittenCommunication: Context and Purpose for Writing

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Demonstratesmethodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purposeof the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/orparaphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flowssmoothly.

Proficient – Demonstrates sufficientapplication of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of thewriting is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are someproblems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flowssomewhat smoothly.

Basic – Demonstrates a limitedunderstanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. Thepurpose of the writing is somewhat evident, but may not be integratedthroughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending ofsummaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in allsections.

Below Expectations – Organizationand presentation of content is extremely limited. The purpose of the writing isunclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes.Paper does not flow smoothly when read.

Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

WrittenCommunication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Displays meticulouscomprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling andgrammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehensionand organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Writtenwork contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic – Displays basic comprehensionof syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains afew errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails todisplay basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar.Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APAFormatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Accurately uses APAformatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formattingthroughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge ofAPA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APArequirements.

Below Expectations – Fails toexhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, makingthe layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

PageRequirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – The paper meets thespecific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Proficient – The paper closely meetsthe page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Basic – The paper meets over half ofthe page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Below Expectations – A fraction ofthe page requirement is completed.

Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

SourceRequirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Uses more than therequired number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to supportideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly withinthe body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses required number ofscholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are usedand cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic – Uses less than the requirednumber of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Mostsources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment.Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations – Uses inadequatenumber of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used maynot be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within thebody of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment iseither nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

HTML tutorial

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.