[Get Answer ]-You Did My Week 2 Assignment Would You Be Interrested In Week 3

Question Description

the sources you included in your Week Two bibliography. Evaluate eachsource and write a critique of the study using the textbook and articlesfrom the Week Two assignment to support your evaluation. Use thefollowing section headings and content in your paper.

  1. Introduction
    • State the purpose of the paper. Clearly identify the studybeing critiqued, by title and authors. Summarize the research question,hypothesis (if a quantitative study), and background information on thetopic from the study’s literature review. Did the authors present awell-balanced summary of current knowledge about the topic? Is there anyapparent bias in the literature review?
    • Methods
      • Differentiate the research design (experimental ornon-experimental) and approach (qualitative or quantitative), samplingmethod, and data collection methods. Indicate the sample size, variablesand measures (if a quantitative study), statistical tests (if aquantitative study), coding and analysis procedures (if a qualitativestudy), and any assumptions made by the researchers. Were the procedureschosen appropriate for the study? What alternative methods would yousuggest?
      • Ethical Aspects
        • Analyze ethical issues pertaining to this study. Did theresearchers explicitly address ethical issues in the article? If not,was there evidence in the report that the participants’ safety andconfidentiality were protected? Was an approval process by anInstitutional Review Board or similar ethics review committee mentioned?Were any of the practices ethically questionable (deception, coercion,etc.)?
        • Results
          • Present a summary of the results of the analysis performedin the study. Did the authors keep their interpretations and conclusionsseparate from the analysis results (evidence)?
          • Discussion and Conclusion
            • Analyze and critique the conclusions drawn by theresearchers. Do the conclusions follow logically from the results of theanalysis? Evaluate the overall efficacy of the research study byidentifying the strengths and weaknesses of aspects of its design andimplementation. Identify the limitations noted by the researchers andadd any limitations you see that were not mentioned in the article.Describe the directions for future research proposed by the authors andevaluate their appropriateness. Recommend at least one idea for a futurestudy that will overcome some of the limitations of this study.  Keepin mind that this suggested future study will serve as the basis foryour Final Paper.

Your paper should be four to six pages in length (excluding title andreference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in theAshford Writing Center. Utilize a minimum of five peer-reviewed sourcesthat were published within the last 10 years and are documented in APAstyle, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. These sources shouldinclude the article being critiqued and three of the sources from yourWeek Two assignment, as well as the course textbook.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

HTML tutorial

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.